| Subject name (in Hungarian, in English) | Production equipment II. | |||
|
Manufacturing devices II.
|
||||
| Neptun code | BMEGEGT0005 | |||
| Type | study unit with contact hours | |||
| Course types and number of hours (weekly / semester) | course type: | lecture (theory) | exercise | laboratory excercise |
| number of hours (weekly): | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| nature (connected / stand-alone): | - | - | - | |
| Type of assessments (quality evaluation) | exam | |||
| ECTS | 3 | |||
| Subject coordinator | name: | Dr. Takács Márton | ||
| post: | associate professor | |||
| contact: | takacs.marton@gpk.bme.hu | |||
| Host organization | Department of Manufacturing Science and Engineering | |||
| https://manuf.bme.hu/?page_id=591 | ||||
| Course homepage | https://manuf.bme.hu/?page_id=1636 | |||
| Course language | hungarian, english | |||
| Primary curriculum type | komplex vizsga tárgycsoport PhD tárgy | |||
| Direct prerequisites | Strong prerequisite | none | ||
| Weak prerequisite | ||||
| Parallel prerequisite | ||||
| Milestone prerequisite | at least obtained 0 ECTS | |||
| Excluding condition | none | |||
Aim
The subject expands the tooling and instrumentation knowledge of technology-oriented doctoral students. The aim of the lectures is to transfer the most important and up-to-date professional knowledge related to tools, tool systems and devices for gripping workpieces. The semester will also discuss the tooling aspects of coolants and lubricants, rapid prototyping capabilities for tools and equipment, modular and flexibly reconfigurable equipment, equipment aspects for special components, tool measurement and inspection, tool monitoring, and industry 4.0. tooling and instrumentation strategies, smart and intelligent tools and toolholders, wear and tear, planned replacement and maintenance of tools and apparatus, and relevant research areas and future trends.
Learning outcomes
Competences that can be acquired by completing the course
Knowledge
He is aware of the design and application aspects of tools required for different cooling and lubrication solutions. He possesses knowledge of rapid prototyping capabilities for tools and devices. He is familiar with modular and flexibly reconfigurable devices. Knows the installation aspects of special parts. Informed about state-of-the-art tooling and equipment strategies interpreted within Industry 4.0. He knows the possibilities and tools of tool measurement and control. He possesses knowledge of smart and intelligent tools and tool holders. Determines the life expectancy of tools and equipment. You are aware of the expected time for planned replacement and maintenance of tools and equipment. It provides an overview of the most important research areas related to modern tools and devices, as well as future trends.
Ability
Selects the most suitable cooling and lubrication solution for the given machining task. Proposes the production of device components by rapid prototype production. Designs a flexibly reconfigurable device for a specific product family. Designs the device for a particular special part. Proposes tooling for an Industry 4.0 manufacturing environment. Selects the appropriate number measurement tool for your production environment. It proposes the use of indexable inserts with embedded sensors and the development of non-contact tool monitoring. Determines the life expectancy of tools and equipment. Specifies the expected time for planned replacement and maintenance of tools and equipment. Able to make forward-looking decisions about the tooling of a given production environment.
Attitude
He constantly monitors his work, results and conclusions. He is receptive to the application of the acquired knowledge using problem-solving techniques. It seeks to disseminate new professional and scientific results. It is open to formulating appropriate criticism or opinions, making decisions and drawing conclusions. It develops your ability to provide accurate and error-free problem solving, engineering precision and accuracy. It applies the principles of energy efficiency, sustainability and environmental awareness in the tasks performed.
Independence and responsibility
Collaborates with faculty and fellow students to expand knowledge. Accepts well-founded professional and other critical remarks. In some situations, as part of a team, you work with your fellow students to solve tasks. With his knowledge, he makes a responsible, informed decision based on his analyzes. He is committed to enriching the field of cutting technology with new knowledge and scientific results. He is committed to the principles and methods of systematic thinking and problem solving.
Teaching methodology
The subject is taught in the form of lectures and consultations. The lectures are mainly in the form of projected presentations, supplemented by sketches made on a whiteboard, as well as detailed explanations. The transfer of knowledge is facilitated by the use of interactive solutions (eg online test) and the playback of relevant videos. Students will develop a semester assignment in a topic related to cutting tools or devices, preferably related to their doctoral thesis.
Support materials
Textbook
Graham T. Smith: Cutting Tool Technology: Industrial Handbook, 2008, ISBN-13: 978-1848002043
Prakash Hiralal Joshi: Jigs and Fixtures, 2010, ISBN: 9780070680739
Lecture notes
Online material
https://manuf.bme.hu/?page_id=1636
Validity of the course description
| Start of validity: | 2020. February 10. |
| End of validity: | 2024. December 31. |
General rules
Assessment of learning outcomes is based on a written dissertation submitted at the end of the semester as a semester assignment, as well as a written and oral exam. A weekly consultation is required to develop a semester assignment. The most important results of the semester dissertation must be presented at the end of the semester. The evaluation of the semester dissertation and presentation must be at least 41%, this is also a condition for signing. The result of the semester dissertation and presentation is included in the semester grade of the subject in 50%. The written exam requires a minimum of 41% success, and the oral exam will take place after passing it.
Assessment methods
Detailed description of mid-term assessments
| Mid-term assessment No. 1 | ||
| Type: | formative assessment, project-based, complex | |
| Number: | 1 | |
| Purpose, description: | Mid-term semester performance is assessed on the basis of a written study on a relevant topic in cutting theory and its presentation at the end of the semester. The semester assignment defined by the instructor - with the consent of the student - fits as far as possible to one of the topics of the student's doctoral thesis. The developed task is expediently the basis for a later scientific publication. A minimum of 41% must be achieved when assessing partial performance. The result of the assignment is part of the end-of-semester grade. | |
Detailed description of assessments performed during the examination period
Elements of the exam:
| Written partial exam | ||
| Obligation: | mandatory (partial) exam unit, failing the unit results in fail (1) exam result | |
| Description: | During the semester, the knowledge given in the lectures and consultations, as well as in the presentations of the subject, as well as the notes, book chapters, other teaching aids and supporting materials provided by the instructor form the basis of the knowledge required during the written exam. The primary goal of the exam element is to assess process-level relationships and causal relationships, as well as current research trends. | |
| Oral partial exam | ||
| Obligation: | mandatory (partial) exam unit, but failing the unit does not results in fail (1) exam result | |
| Description: | During the semester, the knowledge given in the lectures and consultations, as well as in the presentations related to the subject, as well as the notes, book chapters, other teaching aids and supporting materials provided by the instructor form the basis of the knowledge required during the oral exam. The primary goal of the exam element is to assess process-level relationships and causal relationships, as well as current research trends. | |
| Inclusion of mid-term results | ||
| Obligation: | mandatory (partial) exam unit, failing the unit results in fail (1) exam result | |
| Description: | The result of the study prepared during the semester and its presentation at the end of the semester are included in the grade of the subject in 50%. During the evaluation of the study, in addition to the content requirements formulated in the terms of reference, the formal appearance of the study and the researcher's demand for its implementation will also be commented on. During the evaluation of the presentation, the quality of the execution of the presentation aids (eg slide show) and the way and style of the presentation are commented on. | |
The weight of mid-term assessments in signing or in final grading
| ID | Proportion |
|---|---|
| Mid-term assessment No. 1 | 100 % |
The condition for signing is that the score obtained in the mid-year assessments is at least 41%.
The weight of partial exams in grade
| Type: | Proportion |
|---|---|
| Written partial exam | 50 % |
| Oral partial exam | 60 % |
| Inclusion of mid-term results | 50 % |
Determination of the grade
| Grade | ECTS | The grade expressed in percents |
|---|---|---|
| very good (5) | Excellent [A] | above 90 % |
| very good (5) | Very Good [B] | 86 % - 90 % |
| good (4) | Good [C] | 71 % - 86 % |
| satisfactory (3) | Satisfactory [D] | 56 % - 71 % |
| sufficient (2) | Pass [E] | 41 % - 56 % |
| insufficient (1) | Fail [F] | below 41 % |
The lower limit specified for each grade already belongs to that grade.
Attendance and participation requirements
Must be present at at least 70% (rounded down) of lectures.
Special rules for improving, retaken and replacement
The special rules for improving, retaken and replacement shall be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the general rules of the CoS (TVSZ).
| Can the submitted and accepted partial performance assessments be resubmitted until the end of the replacement period in order to achieve better results? | ||
| yes | ||
| Taking into account the previous result in case of improvement, retaken-improvement: | ||
| new result overrides previous result | ||
| The way of retaking or improving a partial assessment for the first time: | ||
| partial assesment(s) in this group can be improved or repeated once up to the end of the repeat period | ||
Study work required to complete the course
| Activity | hours / semester |
|---|---|
| participation in contact classes | 28 |
| elaboration of a partial assessment task | 30 |
| exam preparation | 21 |
| additional time required to complete the subject | 11 |
| altogether | 90 |
Validity of subject requirements
| Start of validity: | 2020. February 10. |
| End of validity: | 2024. December 31. |
Primary course
The primary (main) course of the subject in which it is advertised and to which the competencies are related:
Mechanical engineering sciences PhD programme
Link to the purpose and (special) compensations of the Regulation KKK
This course aims to improve the following competencies defined in the Regulation KKK:
Knowledge
Ability
Attitude
Independence and responsibility
Prerequisites for completing the course
|
Knowledge type competencies
(a set of prior knowledge, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly facilitates the successful completion of the subject) |
none |
|
Ability type competencies
(a set of prior abilities and skills, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly contributes to the successful completion of the subject) |
engineering calculations |