Subject name (in Hungarian, in English) | Final Project | |||
Final Project
|
||||
Neptun code | BMEGEMMBKSD | |||
Type | study unit based on individual work, aided by consultation, without contact hours | |||
Course types and number of hours (weekly / semester) | course type: | lecture (theory) | exercise | laboratory excercise |
number of hours (weekly): | 0 | 10 | 0 | |
nature (connected / stand-alone): | - | individual | - | |
Type of assessments (quality evaluation) | mid-term grade | |||
ECTS | 15 | |||
Subject coordinator | name: | Dr. Kovács Ádám | ||
post: | associate professor | |||
contact: | adamo@mm.bme.hu | |||
Host organization | Department of Applied Mechanics | |||
http://www.mm.bme.hu | ||||
Course homepage | http://www.mm.bme.hu/targyak/?BMEGEMMBKSD | |||
Course language | hungarian, english | |||
Primary curriculum type | mandatory | |||
Direct prerequisites | Strong prerequisite | none | ||
Weak prerequisite | ||||
Parallel prerequisite | ||||
Milestone prerequisite | at least obtained 0 ECTS | |||
Excluding condition | none |
Aim
The aim of the course is for the student to acquire the techniques used in engineering practice in connection with the engineering problem that fits into the training program of the given specialization within the framework of dissertation preparation, to acquire an independent task-solving practice. During the preparation of the dissertation, he demonstrates his maturity for solving engineering tasks to a high standard by solving and documenting tasks related to various topics. During the preparation of the dissertation, the student performs independent engineering work under the guidance of the supervisor of the department - sometimes his / her internal / external consultant - in an individual consultation system, which is coordinated by the supervisor.
Learning outcomes
Competences that can be acquired by completing the course
Knowledge
With the help of his / her supervisor, he / she identifies the main content elements of the dissertation. He gathers the literature with the help of the knowledge acquired during his training. With the help of his prior knowledge, he systematizes the new knowledge gained during the reading of the literature. He has the knowledge needed to analyze the literature reviewed. He / she is aware of the professional knowledge required to perform the tasks in the job description at the appropriate level. It identifies challenges that would require a departure from the terms of reference or an extension of the scope of the tasks. He has the knowledge to consult effectively with his supervisor or consultant. He has the knowledge to propose changes to the terms of reference if necessary. He / she is aware of the professional knowledge on the basis of which he / she is able to make a proposal for the formulation of the points of the task with the help of his / her supervisor. It names the content of each chapter of the dissertation, its length can be formulated on the basis of prior knowledge.
Ability
Understands the tasks in the job description correctly. Specifies the correct order in which the tasks detailed in the job description are performed. Identifies the scope of literature that still needs to be reviewed in order to prepare the dissertation task correctly. Describes the relevant knowledge found in the literature in your dissertation. He applies the professional knowledge acquired during his studies so far during the elaboration of the dissertation. It adequately addresses emerging challenges that would require deviating from the job description or expanding the tasks. In the course of his work, he prepares the results of the literature reviewed or the analysis carried out in order to make the consultations with his / her supervisor effective. Proposes to the supervisor to modify the dissertation assignment if the need arises. After completing the work, make suggestions for ways forward. It analyzes the literature reviewed in the light of what has been learned previously.
Attitude
He constantly monitors his work, results and conclusions with the help of his supervisor and consultant. It expands your knowledge of your chosen field by continuously acquiring knowledge. He is open to using information technology tools and acquiring new skills when needed. It strives to get to know the error-free and routine use of the tool system necessary for solving the technical problems that arise. It develops your ability to provide accurate and error-free problem solving, engineering precision and accuracy.
Independence and responsibility
Collaborates with your supervisor and consultant, as well as your fellow students as needed, to expand your knowledge. During the preparation of the dissertation, he accepts the well-founded professional and other critical remarks. He / she constantly cooperates with his / her supervisor, supervisor and, if necessary, fellow students during the elaboration of the dissertation. With his knowledge, he makes a responsible, well-founded and independent decision based on his analyzes. He feels responsible for the engineering specialization of the specialization, the problems of energy efficiency and sustainable use of the environment, as well as present and future generations.
Teaching methodology
The subject is a unit without contact lessons. The student works independently on a complex task during the semester. He tries to solve the problems that arise during the solution of the task on his own. He / she only uses the help of his / her supervisor, internal / external consultant when making strategic decisions. During the solution of the task, the student comes to the solution of the task with the help of the knowledge and skills acquired during the training.
Support materials
Textbook
Paul Gruba, Justin Zobel: How To Write Your First Thesis, Springer Verlag, 2017, ISBN: 978-3-319-61853-1.
Lecture notes
No book or note after 2005 is yet available for the subject at the time of filling in the form.
Online material
Validity of the course description
Start of validity: | 2021. July 1. |
End of validity: | 2026. June 30. |
General rules
The evaluation of the performance is determined by the supervisor on the basis of the prepared thesis. It defines the topic of the dissertation on the basis of its elaboration, the standard of engineering, the level of processing of the literature related to the topic, the formal, aesthetic appearance, division and logical structure of the dissertation. The aspects of the scoring must be made on the basis of the evaluation form according to the current Faculty Regulations.
Assessment methods
Detailed description of mid-term assessments
Mid-term assessment No. 1 | ||
Type: | formative assessment, project-based, complex | |
Number: | 1 | |
Purpose, description: | The evaluation of the performance is determined by the supervisor on the basis of the prepared thesis. It defines the topic of the dissertation on the basis of its elaboration, the standard of engineering, the level of processing of the literature related to the topic, the formal, aesthetic appearance, division and logical structure of the dissertation. The aspects of the scoring must be made on the basis of the evaluation form according to the current Faculty Regulations. |
Detailed description of assessments performed during the examination period
The subject does not include assessment during the examination period.
The weight of mid-term assessments in signing or in final grading
ID | Proportion |
---|---|
Mid-term assessment No. 1 | 100 % |
The weight of partial exams in grade
There is no exam belongs to the subject.
Determination of the grade
Grade | ECTS | The grade expressed in percents |
---|---|---|
very good (5) | Excellent [A] | above 90 % |
very good (5) | Very Good [B] | 85 % - 90 % |
good (4) | Good [C] | 70 % - 85 % |
satisfactory (3) | Satisfactory [D] | 55 % - 70 % |
sufficient (2) | Pass [E] | 40 % - 55 % |
insufficient (1) | Fail [F] | below 40 % |
The lower limit specified for each grade already belongs to that grade.
Attendance and participation requirements
At least 70% the exercises (rounded down) must be actively attended.
Special rules for improving, retaken and replacement
The special rules for improving, retaken and replacement shall be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the general rules of the CoS (TVSZ).
Can the submitted and accepted partial performance assessments be resubmitted until the end of the replacement period in order to achieve better results? | ||
NO | ||
Taking into account the previous result in case of improvement, retaken-improvement: | ||
new result overrides previous result | ||
The way of retaking or improving a partial assessment for the first time: | ||
partial assesment(s) in this group cannot be improved or repeated, the final result is assessed in accordance with Code of Studied 122. § (6) |
Study work required to complete the course
Activity | hours / semester |
---|---|
participation in contact classes | 140 |
mid-term preparation for practices | 70 |
elaboration of a partial assessment task | 30 |
additional time required to complete the subject | 210 |
altogether | 450 |
Validity of subject requirements
Start of validity: | 2021. July 1. |
End of validity: | 2026. June 30. |
Primary course
The primary (main) course of the subject in which it is advertised and to which the competencies are related:
Mechanical engineering
Link to the purpose and (special) compensations of the Regulation KKK
This course aims to improve the following competencies defined in the Regulation KKK:
Knowledge
- Student is familiar with the general and specific mathematical, scientific and social principles, rules, contexts and procedures needed to operate in the field of engineering.
Ability
- Student has the ability to apply the general and specific mathematical, scientific and social principles, rules, relationships and procedures acquired in solving problems in the field of engineering.
Attitude
- Student is open and receptive to learning, embracing and authentically communicating professional, technological development and innovation in engineering.
Independence and responsibility
- Student shares her acquired knowledge and experience through formal, non-formal and informal information transfer with those in her field.
Prerequisites for completing the course
Knowledge type competencies
(a set of prior knowledge, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly facilitates the successful completion of the subject) |
none |
Ability type competencies
(a set of prior abilities and skills, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly contributes to the successful completion of the subject) |
none |