| Subject name (in Hungarian, in English) | Integrity of engineering structures 2. | |||
|
Integrity os engineering structures 2
|
||||
| Neptun code | BMEGEMTBVS2 | |||
| Type | study unit with contact hours | |||
| Course types and number of hours (weekly / semester) | course type: | lecture (theory) | exercise | laboratory excercise |
| number of hours (weekly): | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| nature (connected / stand-alone): | - | - | - | |
| Type of assessments (quality evaluation) | mid-term grade | |||
| ECTS | 3 | |||
| Subject coordinator | name: | Dr. Májlinger Kornél | ||
| post: | associate professor | |||
| contact: | vmkornel@eik.bme.hu | |||
| Host organization | Department of Material Science and Engineering | |||
| http://www.att.bme.hu/ | ||||
| Course homepage | http://www.att.bme.hu/oktatas/BMEGEMTBVS2 | |||
| Course language | german | |||
| Primary curriculum type | optional | |||
| Direct prerequisites | Strong prerequisite | none | ||
| Weak prerequisite | BMEGEMTBMA1 | |||
| Parallel prerequisite | ||||
| Milestone prerequisite | at least obtained 0 ECTS | |||
| Excluding condition | BMEGEMTAGS1 | |||
Aim
The course can also be taken in mechatronic engineering BSc, with the aim of introducing the interdisciplinary use of the knowledge acquired or to be acquired in the mentioned major subjects (Materialkunde and Technische Mechanik) in engineering practice in German through application examples taken from mechanical engineering practice. The lecturer draws on four decades of industrial (Sulzer) and technical university (ETH Zürich) experience in Western Europe. The development of students; professional German language skills is also the aim of the subject. Integrity of Engineering Structures 2. is the continuation of the subject Integrity of Engineering Structures 1. therefore, builds on it. In the case of student admission, it is assumed that the student taking the subject has previously completed the Integrity of Engineering Structures 1. course. If an interested student had enrolled without meeting this condition, then that student can expect a higher level of application examples and required prior knowledge in the subject.
Learning outcomes
Competences that can be acquired by completing the course
Knowledge
Integrity of Engineering Structures 1. The following points are to be understood in comparison with the subject so that the knowledge of the commonly used conceptual system of materials (metals) knowledge and technology in German is extended. More familiar with the relationship between materials science and mechanics (Strength of materials, Resistance des matériaux). Knows in more detail the basic material testing procedures (destructive, non-destructive). He understands the basics of the technical description of fracture mechanics, fatigue and creep in a more complex way. Systematizes the application of the above to ensure the integrity of engineering structures in connection with industrial practical examples of nuclear power plant equipment (“Fliegende Bauten”, paper industry cylinders, chemical tanks, railway wagons, bogies, etc.). He interprets the use of fractography, scanning electron microscopy in the investigation of the causes of damage (Schadensanalyse). It provides an overview of the comparison of probability (probability) and determinant (deterministic) safety factors in relation to the example of engineering structures that fail with particularly low probability - their mathematical background for probability calculation. Distinguishes between material tests that can be applied directly by the design engineer and so-called technological tests, which are more essential only for the material development engineer. A distinction is also made between so-called technological tests (e.g. Charpy impact bending test, Jominy test), which are essential for the material development engineer and more informative for the design engineer. Provides a comprehensive overview of methods and procedures for solving material technology tasks and problems - also expanded on the Integrity of Engineering Structures 1. compared to the knowledge acquired on the subject.
Ability
Ability to express his / her thoughts in an orderly form, orally and in writing in technically precise technical language. Able to describe machine parts and engineering structures with more complex mechanical models and material testing tests. Determines the processes that take place in machine elements and engineering structures during operational loading, also with the help of mathematical-mechanical descriptive models. Capable of multidimensional analysis of damages (Schadensfälle). It proposes the identification of more complex structure integrity problems, the exploration, formulation and (using learned practical application) of the theoretical and practical background needed to solve them. With IT knowledge, solves complex, computationally intensive tasks. Routinely uses quantitative and qualitative metrics and results that can be obtained from basic material testing procedures. Selects the material testing procedure (s) required for a given complex task or problem identification. Differentiates between test procedures important to the material development engineer and the design engineer and their results. Selects the material testing procedure(s) required for a given task or problem identification according to a diverse system of criteria.
Attitude
Develops collaboration with the instructor and fellow students to expand knowledge. Receptive to the continuous acquisition of knowledge, expanding his knowledge, and receptive to the use of information technology tools. Seeks to learn about and routinely use the toolkit needed to solve structure integrity problems. Strives for an accurate and error-free solution. Seeks to implement the principles of energy efficiency and environmental awareness in solving structural integrity tasks.
Independence and responsibility
Independently thinks through the structure integrity tasks and problems and solves them based on specific resources. Accepts well-founded critical remarks that broaden its technical horizons. Feels responsible for solving a technical problem safely, economically, and in an environmentally conscious way. In some situations, as part of a team, you work with your fellow students to solve tasks. Makes a technically sound decision, which uses a systematic approach to decision making.
Teaching methodology
The primary way to acquire the curriculum and technical approach is to attend lectures. During the lectures, a case studies will be processed and discussed. In addition to the lectures, computational exercises are also presented on these occasions. Other ways of mastering the curriculum are written and oral communication, the use of IT tools and techniques, the solution of optional tasks prepared independently and in group work, and their discussion with others.
Support materials
Textbook
Werkstoffkunde und Werkstoffprüfung, Weissbach Wolfgang, Vieweg Wiesbaden, 11th edition, [1994] ISBN 978-3-322-93987-6
Lukács J. és mások: Szemelvények a mérnöki szerkezetek integritása témaköréből. Miskolci Egyetem, Miskolc [2012] ISBN 978-963-358-000-4
Lecture notes
Online material
http://library.eawag.empa.ch/empa_berichte/EMPA_Bericht_213.pdf
http://library.eawag-empa.ch/empa_berichte/EMPA_Bericht_172.pdf
http://library.eawag-empa.ch/empa_berichte/EMPA_Bericht_173.pdf
Validity of the course description
| Start of validity: | 2017. September 2. |
| End of validity: | 2026. July 15. |
General rules
The assessment of the articulated learning outcomes takes place in several stages. One mid-year written performance measurement (level assessment and summary study performance evaluation) will be written. It is also necessary to give a lecture on the topic of homework. Active evaluation of lectures and seminars was also included in the performance evaluation. The mid-term mark is determined on the basis of the sum of these partial performance evaluations.
Assessment methods
Detailed description of mid-term assessments
| Mid-term assessment No. 1 | ||
| Type: | formative assessment, simple | |
| Number: | 1 | |
| Purpose, description: | Level assessment (control test): a written check of the existence of knowledge type competence elements that are absolutely necessary for the successful completion of further studies within the subject (control test). The part of the curriculum on which the level assessment is based is determined by the lecturer. from test questions, which are the interpretation of each concept and the recognition of the connections between them; essay questions that examine the ability to synthesize and computational tasks that examine the ability to recognize and solve problems; the available working time is a minimum of 10 and a maximum of 25 minutes. | |
| Mid-term assessment No. 2 | ||
| Type: | summative assessment | |
| Number: | 1 | |
| Purpose, description: | Summarizing academic performance evaluation: a complex, written way of evaluating the competence-type competence elements of the subject and knowledge in the form of an indoor test, the test basically focuses on the application of the acquired knowledge, so it focuses on problem recognition and solution, during the performance evaluation, the part of the curriculum on which the evaluation is based is determined by the lecturer of the subject, the available working time is 90 minutes. | |
| Mid-term assessment No. 3 | ||
| Type: | formative assessment, project-based, complex | |
| Number: | 1 | |
| Purpose, description: | Partial performance evaluation (lecture, homework): a complex way of evaluating the knowledge, ability, attitude, as well as independence and responsibility type competence elements of the subject, the form of which is the individual or group homework, the content, requirements, and deadline of the homework -the method of assessment is determined by the lecturer of the subject. The proportion of homework assessment is 40% and that of the lecture is 5%. Partial performance assessment (active participation): a simplified way of assessing the competence elements of the subjects knowledge, ability, attitude, and independence and responsibility, the form of which is the prepared appearance and active participation. in the process of a seminar, an example solution led to students on request; the uniform assessment principles are defined jointly by the person in charge of the subject and the lecturer of the subject. | |
| Mid-term assessment No. 4 | ||
| Type: | formative assessment, simple | |
| Number: | 1 | |
| Purpose, description: | Partial performance assessment (active participation): a simplified way of assessing the knowledge, ability, attitude, and autonomy and responsibility type competence elements of the subject, in the form of prepared appearance and active participation in the seminar process, on-demand example solution for students; the uniform assessment principles are defined jointly by the person in charge of the subject and the lecturer of the subject. | |
Detailed description of assessments performed during the examination period
The subject does not include assessment during the examination period.
The weight of mid-term assessments in signing or in final grading
| ID | Proportion |
|---|---|
| Mid-term assessment No. 1 | 10 % |
| Mid-term assessment No. 2 | 40 % |
| Mid-term assessment No. 3 | 45 % |
| Mid-term assessment No. 4 | 5 % |
The weight of partial exams in grade
There is no exam belongs to the subject.
Determination of the grade
| Grade | ECTS | The grade expressed in percents |
|---|---|---|
| very good (5) | Excellent [A] | above 90 % |
| very good (5) | Very Good [B] | 85 % - 90 % |
| good (4) | Good [C] | 73 % - 85 % |
| satisfactory (3) | Satisfactory [D] | 65 % - 73 % |
| sufficient (2) | Pass [E] | 50 % - 65 % |
| insufficient (1) | Fail [F] | below 50 % |
The lower limit specified for each grade already belongs to that grade.
Attendance and participation requirements
Must be present at at least 70% (rounded down) of lectures.
Special rules for improving, retaken and replacement
The special rules for improving, retaken and replacement shall be interpreted and applied in conjunction with the general rules of the CoS (TVSZ).
| Need mid-term assessment to invidually complete? | ||
| yes | ||
| Can the submitted and accepted partial performance assessments be resubmitted until the end of the replacement period in order to achieve better results? | ||
| yes | ||
| The way of retaking or improving a summary assessment for the first time: | ||
| the summative assessments can be retaken or improved only combined | ||
| Is the retaking-improving of a summary assessment allowed, and if so, than which form: | ||
| one single, combined retake or grade-improving exam is possible for all assesments | ||
| Taking into account the previous result in case of improvement, retaken-improvement: | ||
| out of multiple results, the best one is to be taken into account | ||
| The way of retaking or improving a partial assessment for the first time: | ||
| partial assesment(s) in this group can be improved or repeated once up to the end of the repeat period | ||
Study work required to complete the course
| Activity | hours / semester |
|---|---|
| participation in contact classes | 28 |
| preparation for summary assessments | 16 |
| elaboration of a partial assessment task | 38 |
| additional time required to complete the subject | 8 |
| altogether | 90 |
Validity of subject requirements
| Start of validity: | 2017. September 2. |
| End of validity: | 2026. July 15. |
Primary course
The primary (main) course of the subject in which it is advertised and to which the competencies are related:
Mechanical engineering
Link to the purpose and (special) compensations of the Regulation KKK
This course aims to improve the following competencies defined in the Regulation KKK:
Knowledge
- Student has the comprehensive knowledge of the main properties and applications of structural materials used in engineering.
Ability
- Student has the ability to apply the general and specific mathematical, scientific and social principles, rules, relationships and procedures acquired in solving problems in the field of engineering.
Attitude
- Student strives to carry out their work in a complex approach based on a systems and process-oriented thinking.
Independence and responsibility
- Student shares her acquired knowledge and experience through formal, non-formal and informal information transfer with those in her field.
Prerequisites for completing the course
|
Knowledge type competencies
(a set of prior knowledge, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly facilitates the successful completion of the subject) |
Materials Structure and Materials Testing and Metals Technology or Materials Knowledge courses resp. their German or English equivalents or Integrity of engineering structures 1. course. |
|
Ability type competencies
(a set of prior abilities and skills, the existence of which is not obligatory, but greatly contributes to the successful completion of the subject) |
none |